И аре ако ще развиваме теореми "как да се задържа жена". Ще ти цитирам Rollo Tomassi.
As I stated, SMV doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Men may have an Alpha
dominance established only to have it knocked back down after failing a
particularly bad shit test. He may rate lower or higher depending on a social
status that’s in flux. A woman must find ways to cope with an ever decaying
SMV once she reaches her SMV peak and begins her decline towards the
Wall. Childbirth and rearing, weight gain, satisfying a security need, and
many other factors may also accelerate this process.
What I’m going to do here is propose a general outline for SMV disparity based on the ratio between both sexes. Before you read my outlines, keep in
mind the Cardinal Rule of Relationships:
In any relationship, the person with the most power is the one who needs the other the least.
The overarching concept here is that the person in the relationship with the
superior sexual market value will at least be perceived by the person of
lesser value to need them less than the other. If it is established by concrete
social proof that one person is of higher SMV than the other, it’s usually an
accepted reality of that relationship, but bear in mind that it is the fluctuating
perception of SMV that has more influence on the attachment and strength
of that relationship.
Finally, from a feminine perspective it’s important to remember that
Hypergamy is a game of perceptions, testing, confirmations and retesting
new perceptions. This process has a pronounced effect on SMV evaluation,
which is then influenced by a woman’s own self-perceptions.
1:1
This is the position of True Neutral I illustrated with my friend’s situation
above. I’m starting here because this ratio is the mythological ideal every
equalist will tell you they’re striving for.
Be they male or female, what
adherents of equal balance fail to consider is that real, sustainable
equilibrium in SMV is an impossibility. What every modern woman and
gelded male in an LTR will tell you is that they believe they are common
examples of that SMV equilibrium.
The truth is that their ego investment in
that equalist idealism wont allow for the real introspect necessary to
accurately evaluate what their true individual SMV really is –both in relation
to themselves and the greater whole of society in their demographic.
Hypergamy never seeks its own level, but this is what a True Neutral
believes is possible.
A 1:1 SMV doesn’t exist. I’m sure there will be naysayers who feel they “play it fair” with their wives or girlfriends, but the fact remains that SMV is always in flux and doesn’t allow for a true, sustainable equilibrium.
Hypergamy is an easy example; fail one too many shit tests and your
equitable 1:1 ratio slips to 2:1 in a woman’s favor.
A man getting to the gym more frequently or getting a promotion in status may be enough to raise that 1:1 balance.
There are simply too many variables in a contemporary
relationship to take the notion of SMV equilibrium seriously. Furthermore,
we must consider the effect that social media plays in women selfevaluations of their own SMV. And this is only one (albeit significant) social
distortion that can upset the idealistic equitable balance.
Even in the most stable and SMV balanced pairings, the simple fact that both
sexes’ SMV peaks occur at differing phases of life makes the notion of a
contented balance laughable.
However, it is important for a Man to bear in mind that his SMV will eventually exceed that of any woman if he continues to improve himself and grows personally, physically and financially into his SMV peak years.
There will eventually come a time when a woman’s SMV will decay to the point that her necessitousness will exceed her value.
In
other words, due to her fast burn-fast decay SMV, and recognized or not, she
will eventually need a Man more than he needs her when he enters his peak
SMV phase and she’s declined to the Wall of her own.
It’s during this critical phase that a woman must rely on her man’s socially
expected love, charity, obligation and parental investment to maintain his
secure attachment to her in the face of an obvious SMV imbalance.
As I’ve
covered before, women fundamentally lack the capacity to appreciate the
sacrifices men make to facilitate women’s reality – and once those facial
wrinkles and cellulite can no longer be disguised by makeup or collagen,
women will still persist in the expectation of monogamous obligation, in
preference to the genuine desire, love, devotion, etc. a man may legitimately
feel about her regardless of her wrinkles.
2:1 (да вметна - тука не се има предвид мъж дет е 10-ка и жена дет е 5-ца, а мъж дето е с 1-точка по-високо SMV от жената с него... или обратното, т.е. жена с 1 точка по-висока от мъжа до нея)
This ratio has been defined in the past as the golden mean of SMV between
the genders – so long as the man is on the beneficial side of it.
The most successful, stable and loving relationships don’t result from being ‘equally yoked’ – they result from a mutually acknowledged SMV superiority and masculine dominance of a positively masculine male and his adoring, yet subconsciously anxious, woman who is up to a point below him in her subjective SMV evaluation.
Some guys get to this position by default. Either aided by genetics, prior
hard work or simply being single at the phase of life when his SMV is
peaking while hers is in decline, a man can prolong this ratio far longer and
far more realistically than the 1:1 idealization.
This isn’t to say his SMV
can’t be reduced by failing shit tests or by unfortunate personal
circumstances, but the durability and resiliency of his higher SMV affords
him more leeway in recovering from these missteps or calamities.
A man doesn’t necessarily need to be an Alpha cad to establish this ratio, all
that’s required is an acknowledged recognition of this SMV imbalance and
the appropriate recognition and adoration from the woman involved.
There are plenty of Betas who enjoy the benefits of a 2:1 ratio even when they
don’t (or refuse to) recognize an SMV imbalance that weighs in their favor.
From a female side a 2:1 ratio is generally what most modern women find
themselves dealing with; through realized fact or by self-deluded
overestimation of their own SMV, most women reflexively presume they are
the party with the higher SMV.
These are the naggers, the brow beaters, the
women who wistfully to resentfully wish their men were more than they are.
They crave the SMV imbalance that a dominant Alpha would satisfy, yet
through their own ego investments, or due to their inability to lock that
Alpha down, they must relegate themselves to being the less necessitous
person in their LTR.
3:1
While this is a tenable situation for a Man it borders on the unhealthy.
Marginal fame, notoriety or an actualized condition of widely acknowledged
social proof can make for a 3:1 SMV ratio.
"Аз ей тука се целя - нацепен батка, милионер, IT гуру, с 2 фирми, татуси, апартаменти. Дали ще ми е зле!?"* 😏
These are the Men who other women can’t help but be attracted and aroused by, and other men aspire to be
in one way or another.
The women they do pair off with are faced with two
options: either maturely accept this inequity and rely on feminine wiles (and
sexual performance) to create a situation of ‘value added’ emotional
investment and secure his monogamy, or accept that she will only be a short
term breeding option for him before a woman who’s a better SMV option
presents herself to him.
Only the most secure of women in this ratio pairing don’t suffer from an
state of passive Dread.
While a 2:1 pairing may force a women to deal with
marginal self-doubt and underlying competition anxiety, a woman in a 3:1
pairing will have to confront the dread of loss that accompanies a less stable
pairing.
From a Hypergamic perspective, she’s hit the evolutionary jackpot –
sexual pairing with a mate she wouldn’t normally have access to.
Fat women
who garner the drunken attentions of an out-of-options man of higher SMV
make for the most common occurrences of a 3:1 pairing.
Irrational jealousy
and ‘accidental pregnancies’ are not uncommon in this pairing.
"Хехе, при мене нема да са 'инцидентни', а планирани!" 😄 "Но да - такава жена ще ме съсипе от ревност. И сега като едни колежки на по 30 разбраха, че съм 'шефче на фирма', почнаха да ме канят на кафенца... конкуренцията ще я влуди..."
I should
point out that a 3:1 pairing may also be the result of a 2:1 pairing that lasted
into a man’s peak years and bumped him up a point, or more likely, the
woman depreciated down a point or more as she hit the Wall.
From the female side, a 3:1 ratio is generally only a temporary condition.
Leaving a man who is recognizably a full 2 points beneath her in SMV is
really only a formality.
Women’s Hypergamous attraction floor simply
doesn’t work like that of men’s.
Generally this female-side pairing is the
result of an extreme circumstance, a particularly materialistic woman or a
man who convinced a woman he was more Alpha than he seemed only to
backslide into Betaness once he mistakenly thought he could get comfortable
with her and expected her to love him for just being himself.
It should also be considered that a 3:1 female-side pairing may also be the result of a post Wall professional woman pairing off with the only Beta so intently conditioned in feminine-primary psychology that she would consider him preferable to celibacy.
"Хехе, бизнес дами със спортистчета!" 😄 "Зет ми сега е с неква 'шефка на фирма' дет е минала възрастта за деца"
"Даже виждаш некви красиви бизнес дами (чакащи последният влак за деца) с дебелаци. Най-добрите шеги на Майка Природа!" 😄
4+:1
We’re pushing into the improbable here, but these pairings do exist.
Your first thought may be the famous celebrity or musician who marries a
‘commoner’, but the more likely scenario is one where a previously more
equitable pairing was solidified and one partner decayed so dramatically that
this extreme imbalance resulted.
It’s easy to find online before and after examples of women progressively fattening from a trim sexy girl of 19 to a
200lbs+ Landmonster of 26.
I wish I could say these were outliers, but as all too many bloggers in the Manosphere will attest, it’s increasingly common.
"Ахаха - 75% от хамериканците са с наднормено тегло. Не искам да съм тука. Българите за сега се държим, ама и тука почна да става 'нормално'. Много дебели жени виждам по улиците... ужас!" 😄
Women in the ‘before-and-after’ demographic who find themselves in a 4+:1
are often the most dependent upon the feminine social convention
established to delimit men’s sexual selectivity.
The Body Fat embracers and
the ‘shallow’ men shamers are the most obvious examples.
Other than for the most egregious of gold diggers a sustainable 4:1 balance
from the feminine side is a virtual impossibility.
"Ок, тука също бих изпаднал, макар че изневерите ще са често срещани!"
4+:1 е специално за Реконструктор дето твърди, че богатите чичаци нямат "стабилни връзки"! 😏
